Real Estate Law
Reading Time
5 MINUTE READ
In Canada, purchasing real estate without Title Insurance is legally permissible, but it shifts the burden of risk significantly. While provincial land registration systems provide a foundation of security, they are not exhaustive. Without insurance, a buyer relies almost entirely on their lawyer’s due diligence, the Land Titles Act of their province, and the specific terms of the Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS).
In provinces like British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario, the “Land Titles” or Torrens system offers strong protection. Under BC’s Land Title Act [RSBC 1996] c. 250, s. 23(2), an indefeasible title is “conclusive evidence” that the registered owner is entitled to the land. Similarly, Alberta’s Land Titles Act, s. 62(1) defines a certificate of title as “conclusive proof” in court.
In Ontario, s. 87 of the Land Titles Act confirms that a transfer for valuable consideration confers an estate in fee simple free from most unregistered interests. However, these protections have critical statutory exceptions.
Even a “conclusive” title is subject to specific override interests. Under Ontario’s Land Titles Act, s. 44(1) and BC’s Land Title Act, s. 23(2), your property remains subject to:
Title Insurance is designed to cover these “off-title” risks, which a standard records search might miss.
If a title defect is discovered before closing, the APS is your primary weapon. In McLean v Crotty, 2018 ONSC 6211, the court ruled that an undisclosed registered easement allowed the buyer to rescind the contract and recover their deposit. The court emphasized that vendors must provide title clear of any encumbrances not specifically permitted by the agreement.
Furthermore, the Ontario Court of Appeal in EPRF Holdings Limited v Fergus Bloor Inc., 2024 ONCA 707 clarified that if a vendor cannot remedy a work order or obtain title insurance to “insure over” a defect, the buyer is entitled to treat the agreement as at an end.
Without insurance, the lawyer’s duty of disclosure becomes paramount. In van Delft v Maddalena, 2024 NSSC 75, a lawyer was held liable for failing to properly explain an easement and the qualifications of the title. If you choose to forgo insurance, your legal recourse often shifts from a simple insurance claim to complex litigation against the seller or a negligence claim against your legal counsel.
For professional legal guidance on Canadian real estate transactions and title protection, visit
Canada H&C Application Fees: A Comprehensive Guide to the Legal and Financial Framework Navigating Humanitarian and Compassionate (H&C) applications in Canada requires a clear understanding of both the procedural requirements and the underlying statutory financial
This article details the legal criteria and statutory conditions evaluated by the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) when deciding to stay a removal order on humanitarian and compassionate grounds. It explains how the tribunal balances diverse factors, such as the best interests of affected children, the depth of an individual’s establishment in Canada, and their potential for rehabilitation.
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Mason (2023) provides a strong framework to reject overbroad interpretations of security inadmissibility by requiring a strict, direct nexus to Canada’s national security.
0 Comments