Immigration and Refugees Law
Reading Time
5 MINUTE READ
A common question among asylum seekers in Canada is whether they can simultaneously pursue a Humanitarian and Compassionate (H&C) application while their refugee protection claim is still active. Practically speaking, a person whose refugee claim is still pending cannot have an H&C application examined at the same time.
The primary legal barrier is found in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). Section 25(1.2)(b) explicitly dictates:
“The Minister may not examine the request if … (b) the foreign national has made a claim for refugee protection that is pending before the Refugee Protection Division or the Refugee Appeal Division”
The text of the law draws a distinct line between the physical submission of an application and its actual assessment. On one hand, the regulations outline the administrative requirements for making a request:
“A request made by a foreign national under subsection 25(1) of the Act must be made as an application in writing…”: Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, s. 66.
Furthermore, the Act states that the Minister takes formal charge of the request once fees are settled:
“The Minister is seized of a request referred to in subsection (1) only if the applicable fees in respect of that request have been paid.”: Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, s. 25(1.1).
However, despite these administrative mechanics of submission, the Minister is strictly prohibited from examining the H&C request as long as the refugee claim remains pending before the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) or the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD).
Consult with Pax Law Corporation’s lawyers to review your case status.
Instant Consultation Booking Form
The Federal Court of Canada has consistently upheld this statutory bar, clarifying that it acts as a legal prohibition on reviewing the merits of the case rather than a mere administrative hurdle.
In Bello v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1094, at paragraph 49, the Court affirmed:
“The Applicant did not apply under s. 25(1) of the IRPA. Moreover, as the Officer noted, the Applicant is statutorily unable to avail herself of s. 25(1) of the IRPA given her pending refugee protection claim. The Officer noted the application of s. 25(1.2)(b) of the IRPA states ‘(The Minister may not examine the request if (…) (b) the foreign national has made a claim for refugee protection that is pending before the Refugee Protection Division or the Refugee Appeal Division)’.”
Similarly, in Otiteh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1537, at paragraph 18, the Court noted:
“First, with respect to s. 25(1), the Officer reasonably declined to consider the H&C grounds put forth by the Principal Applicant, because of the exception under s. 25(1.2)(b), since the Principal Applicant had a pending refugee protection claim before the IRB at the time he submitted his permanent residency application…”
In Yuris v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 981, the Federal Court reiterated the literal statutory text to emphasize that the restriction blocks the actual evaluation of the application:
“The Minister may not examine the request if the foreign national has made a claim for refugee protection that is pending before the Refugee Protection Division or the Refugee Appeal Division.”
While the general rule is clear, unique procedural circumstances can occasionally alter how the bar is applied. In Liang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 287, without creating a broad or sweeping exception, the Federal Court determined that based purely on the unique factual background of that specific case, an officer was permitted to rule on an H&C application:
“on the particular facts of this matter, the Officer was not precluded pursuant to s 25(1.2)(b) of the IRPA or otherwise, from rendering the H&C decision while the RPD’s re-determination of the Female Applicant’s claim was pending.”
This underlines that while the general legal principle stands firm, unusual procedural histories require a careful look at the exact facts of the case.
Ultimately, under normal conditions, an H&C application cannot be concurrently examined if a refugee claim is pending.
ناوبری در سیستم پناهندگی کانادا نیازمند درک دقیق این موضوع است که چه کسانی از نظر قانونی صلاحیت ارائه مشاوره و وکالت را دارند. در تورنتو، یک وکیل پناهندگی در تورنتو معمولاً وکیلی است که
Canada H&C Application Fees: A Comprehensive Guide to the Legal and Financial Framework Navigating Humanitarian and Compassionate (H&C) applications in Canada requires a clear understanding of both the procedural requirements and the underlying statutory financial
This article details the legal criteria and statutory conditions evaluated by the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) when deciding to stay a removal order on humanitarian and compassionate grounds. It explains how the tribunal balances diverse factors, such as the best interests of affected children, the depth of an individual’s establishment in Canada, and their potential for rehabilitation.
0 Comments